In an excellent bio, Христиан Леман, published in the Petersburg Theatrical Journal in 2000, Anna Nekrylova, the historian of Russian popular spectacle (this lecture on Russian puppet theatre I think modifies the current Italianate view of Russian puppetry), says that Christian Lehman/Lehmann/Leman and his brother came to Russia from Europe in 1818 and worked first in Moscow, and that Christian moved to St. Petersburg in the early 1820s, acting and running a modest menagerie (including a boa constrictor, a lion, a jaguar, a hyena, a jackal, an ostrich, and a walrus), while his brother stayed on in the ancient capital. As a theatrical entrepreneur, Christian was synonymous with high-class, large-scale, mass-market, multi-media, commedia dell’arte buffoonery in Petersburg at Shrovetide and Easter in a period lasting from the mid-1820s until the terrible fire which in February 1836 destroyed his business and hundreds of his customers—according to Johann Georg Kohl, they laughed at a clown as he implored them to flee this “harlequin’s hell.” Nekrylova rightly credits Lehmann with major innovations in terms of content and presentation, and demonstrates his contemporary and subsequent social impact. However, as she says, “we know nothing about where and when Lehmann was born and died, what and with whom he studied, where he toured before coming to Russia, whether he had a family, etc.” Unable to afford theatre rents after the disaster, he left secretly, and his fate has hitherto been a mystery.
But we spectators demand more of this marvellous man, and we believe earnestly that he is none other than Herr Von Christian Lehmann, who, along with Herr Von Andrew Lehmann, Mademoiselle Adelaide Lehmann, and Mademoiselle Matilde Lehmann, and billed as the Lehmann Family, “the First Rope Dancers in the World,” “exhibit their wonderful performances upon La Corde Elastique” in 1839 at the Royal Grecian Saloon on the City Road in Shoreditch, London. Here’s another show of theirs. This seems credible, since Christian’s early gags in Petersburg including him rope-dancing mounted on a colossal rooster and an old woman, and rope-walking requires little financial investment and is portable.
Christian Lehmann, rope-walking in London in 1839. Image: East London Theatre Archive.
In 1840, Jules Martiny’s Histoire du théâtre de Liège (1887) finds the same family (Fichiers / p247) performing at the Theatre Royal at Liège, Belgium:
Après M. Eben, une troupe de Pantomimistes russes donna, du 12 au 27 mars, 6 représentations de pantomimes, danses, exercices acrobatiques, exécutés par la famillie LEHMAN.
By 1847, according to Thomas Allston Brown’s History of the American Stage (1870), they were in New York:
LEHMAN FAMILY, THE. Consisting of M’lles Adelaide, Mathilde, Julie, Flora and Caroline; Messrs Antoine, Christian, and Charles Winther. Made their American debut at the Park Theatre, New York in Aug., 1847. First appeared in Philadelphia Sept. 29, 1847 at the Arch Street Theatre.
They also travelled in America. There are various mentions from the 1860s in Ettore Rella‘s splendid 1940 History of Burlesque in San Francisco. Here is what sounds like Christian, purveying visual gags with the allegedly French Martinettis during a 45-night run in 1860-1:
In the pantomime (The Red Gnome),Harvard appears to house copies of synopses (?) for Lehmann’s The Red Gnome and the White Warrior: A Fairy Pantomime, which was apparently translated from French, and of his Medina, Or, A Dream and Reality: A Grand Romantic Fairy Pantomime. Anyone? Mr. Lehman is very effective as the ‘Gnome.’ Much serio-comic use is made in this piece of a hidoous character representing a skeleton, which offends against good taste. The figure has a peculiar hitch, or palsied dropping of the side when it walks, which will be apt to haunt the memory of the nervous.
And here’s what Andrew Lehman apparently did in 1867 for the première of The Black Rook at the Metropolitan Theatre on Montgomery Street between Washington and Jackson:
The scenery is entirely new, and of the most splendid description. Andrew Lehman, the artist, has never painted better, and he has long enjoyed the reputation of being one of the best scenic artists in the world. The stage decorations and paraphernalia are gorgeous and abundant. In the ballet scene in the first act, immense wreaths of roses are introduced with splendid effect in the groupings. In the incantation scene in the second act, a lofty waterfall, with real water is introduced; while at the close of the scene, after Hartstein, the Magician (Mr. Howson) has ratified his compact with Astaroff, the arch-fiend, there is a sudden rush of demons, hideous reptiles, black rooks, phantom steeds with their riders, and other things ghastly and horrible, that make up a scene of awful weirdness and horror.Musical comedy The Black Rook was the subject of a remarkable Californian copyright suit in 1867. Circuit Judge Deady ruled that it plagiarised the smuttily innovative and nonsensical Faust rip-off, The Black Crook, but that copyright protection was denied, since the Constitution grants the power to pass copyright and patent laws “to promote the progress of science and useful arts,” and the Black Crook “merely panders to the prurient curiosity by very questionable exhibitions of the female person.” In response to protests, Deady said “that the case had been decided and could not be re-opened; that there was sufficient in the testimony in his judgment to warrant the belief that the play depended for its attractions upon exhibitions of women in a state of partial undress, or, as one of the witnesses described it, of ‘women lying around loose.’” So the music available here and the libretto here will probably not help you decide whether it’s worth reviving, so try the Bowery Boys’ excellent podcast.
This attribution to Andrew is contradicted by TAB (“Andrew Lehman, who was for many years principal performer on the corde elastique, and leading pantomimist of the Gabriel Ravel Troupe, died at St. Jago de Cuba, Dec. 15, 1863, aged 30 years”), and Christian certainly did set design. Design and Art Australia Online has him & his civilising one of Britain’s remotest colonies:
scene-painter and actor, [and] a member of the celebrated Lehman ballet troupe which visited Australia in 1867, opening at Sydney’s Prince of Wales Opera House on 12 October and at Melbourne’s Royal Haymarket on 18 November. Christian Lehman assisted Messrs Pitt and Fry on the Melbourne scenery for the pantomime Harlequin Rumplestiltskin [aka Harlequin Rumpelstiltskin or, the Demon Dwarf of the Goblin Gold Mines]. The transformation scene, ‘the nymphs of the Silver Grotto, a scene of surpassing taste and beauty’, was specifically attributed to him. He and Mr Martin played the pantaloons in the Harlequinade, his younger brother, Auguste Lehman, and W.B. Gill playing the clowns in the same sequence
More details of the production here.
Thomas Allston Brown notes that at some stage “Adelaide was burnt to death at Niblo’s Garden, New York,” and tragedy struck again on the way home from Australia:
Mad. Anna Lehman, wife of Christian Lehman, died at sea in June, 1868, of consumption, going from Sydney to San Francisco, aged 32 [!] years. Christian Lehman died on Aug. 26, 1868, in San Francisco, Cal., of asthma aged 73 years.
Christian’s age at death computes with his arriving in Petersburg in 1818, even allowing for some theatrical give-and-take.
So there we are. I still wonder about the origins of this extraordinary man. Nekrylova suggests (do (try to) read it!) that he might have been active in théâtre de la foire-type entertainments around Paris as a lad (by then they had generally transferred to the boulevards), which sounds reasonable, but a quick search in the usual haystacks reveals no needles.
I would like to believe that the surviving Lehmans left the world of smoke and mirrors and went into banking.
|⇑1||Harvard appears to house copies of synopses (?) for Lehmann’s The Red Gnome and the White Warrior: A Fairy Pantomime, which was apparently translated from French, and of his Medina, Or, A Dream and Reality: A Grand Romantic Fairy Pantomime. Anyone?|
|⇑2||Musical comedy The Black Rook was the subject of a remarkable Californian copyright suit in 1867. Circuit Judge Deady ruled that it plagiarised the smuttily innovative and nonsensical Faust rip-off, The Black Crook, but that copyright protection was denied, since the Constitution grants the power to pass copyright and patent laws “to promote the progress of science and useful arts,” and the Black Crook “merely panders to the prurient curiosity by very questionable exhibitions of the female person.” In response to protests, Deady said “that the case had been decided and could not be re-opened; that there was sufficient in the testimony in his judgment to warrant the belief that the play depended for its attractions upon exhibitions of women in a state of partial undress, or, as one of the witnesses described it, of ‘women lying around loose.’” So the music available here and the libretto here will probably not help you decide whether it’s worth reviving, so try the Bowery Boys’ excellent podcast.|
- The secret life of organ-grinders
Speculation in French revolutionary fiduciary currency, the murder of the great British ballad-singer, & a revised date (1802) for the start
- Where did Petersburg’s organ-grinders go in winter?
I fear only some of them migrated with the swallows. Featuring Boris Sadovskoy, Yuri Norstein, Aleksey Batalov, Rolan Bykov and Gogol.
- On the French penchant for inventing things already in existence elsewhere
François Dominique Séraphin, Bourbon favourite and reputedly the father of ombres chinoises (shadow puppetry), began operating 15 years later than is
- So where does Silvio Berlusconi stand on organ-grinders?
Unfortunately Alan Friedman’s excellent authorised bio, My Way, leaves us none the wiser.
- Donald for Dalai Lama, or Pope, or Caliph, or something
A Trump Taj Mahal Casino multitrack jukebox, to help make religion rather better than it has been, again.