The economics of c => k, and so on

Just a couple of Russian daisies for the chain:

  • One of the aims of the great Russian spelling reform of 1917 was apparently to make War and Peace shorter, thus saving paper. It is strange then that socialists in the rest of the world ended up trading c for k, which actually uses more ink.
  • If the reform was implemented partly by getting revolutionary sailors to seize forbidden letters from Petrograd printshops, what were the penalties for trying to hang on to dodgy characters, and were they more severe for some letters than for others? Did any bourgeois typemonkeys decide that they might as well be hung for a capital Yat’ as for a small izhitsa? (Where can I find a glossary of early Communist insults?)

Similar posts

  • Skinheads Badalona Gulaglovers
    Vilafranca’s revolutionary socialists, predicting a camp future for their better-shaven friends from the seaside.
  • c(h)/qu => k and early/mobile spanish/italian writing
    Tearing myself away from puffing the undoubted pleasures of wines of the Penedès for a moment, I would point out that
  • Hsieh Ch’ing kao on Spain and Portugal
    From the The Hai-Lu (1783-1797), as quoted on this page on this excellent site, again via TdiT: Portugal (called Ta-hsi-yang, or Pu-luchi-shih
  • Brothel news
    A good friend of progressive bent had planned to improve life in a minor provincial capital by setting up a gay
  • Optimising furrin
    I do like Bryan Palmer’s WP aggregation plugin, which has replaced the horrible thing I cobbled together, and partly for the


Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *