A summary of the statement made to the Commons in April 1714 (History and Proceedings of the House of Commons : volume 5: 1713-1714):
Catalonia swore loyalty to Philip V and its ancient privileges were guaranteed. Unfortunately it then changed its mind, rebelled, and appealed to Britain for help, claiming that Catalonia and Spain were ready to rise in favour of Charles III. On the understanding that Anne’s only commitment would be to request the granting of said ancient privileges from Charles III, a British fleet was sent to support a rebellion or exact retribution along the coast should no rebellion be forthcoming. Charles was uninterested in the project, so when Peterborough took Barcelona in 1705 it was as an accessory to the Catalans, and as a result no guarantee with respect to Catalonia can be said to have existed on the part of the British. In 1712 there was a prospect of peace and the British part of the proposed war budget had run out without the other allies having made any contribution. Charles was however not prepared to settle and Philip seized on this folly to demand a basic treaty including only the forgiveness of estates and honours and a forgetting of acts committed. The final Utrecht treaty in 1713 incorporated this amnesty and in addition granted to Catalans privileges hitherto granted solo to Castilians, including commercially vital access to colonial markets. The treaty made no reference to ancient privileges, and the hopeless resistance apparently contemplated by the rulers of Barcelona made their maintenance more improbable than it already was. On their heads be it.
The impeachment of Harley, Earl of Oxford constitutes an emotional alternative reading. He was, however, acquitted.
- Revisionist version of September 11 1714
Here‘s what Ciudadanos thinks you should know about the fall of Barcelona in 1714, mourned tomorrow by nationalists with silly flags,
- Franco’s Catalans
There’s so much dreadful journalism in Catalonia that it’s a great relief to read Xavier Rius, head hontxo over at e-noticies.com.
- Comparison of Spanish and English development law and practice
Over at Charles Svoboda’s blog for Abusos Urbanísticos No. Its anonymous British lawyer author concludes that The hope is that the authorities
- El Cas dels Catalans and the House of the British Parliament
Early Day Motions are the British House of Commons’s ineffectual version of Facebook “likes”: they have no significance in the broader
- Spanish airport traffic trends
Variation in air traffic numbers throws interesting light on Spain’s problems as it plunges into recession.